Tuesday, June 29, 2010

What's Next For U.S. Soccer?


And so another World Cup has come and gone for the United States' soccer team. But instead of crashing out of the tournament like in 2006, the Americans fought on until a heartbreaking ending saw them exit with unfulfilled potential and questions of what might have been.

Now that the din has died down and half of America has forgotten what a yellow card is and what the World Cup is all about, the long-term question arises: What's next for U.S. Soccer?

5. Youth Development













In the next two decades the United States Soccer Federation and its top tier professional leagues need to fine tune their youth development system. As Stateside Soccer reported back in February, United States U17 star Luis Gil was the center of a supposed signing battle in which Major League Soccer beat out Arsenal to sign the youngster. In doing so, however, the MLS arguably robbed a future USMNT star from experience in one of the world's best development systems. I'm all for developing US players at home, but the MLS has neither the resources nor the competitive level to properly develop the talents of our youngest players. The result is a stunted growth wherein the players reach their peak later than many other world talents.

4. MLS Expansion














With wild speculation flying around about the make-up of a 20 team MLS, the consensus seems to be that MLS is growing and will continue into the next decade. Whether the league will creep past 20 teams or the US Soccer Federation will step in and develop second and third tier leagues is yet to be seen. But either way, soccer will be growing over the next four years and - as long as the speed of growth is kept at a responsible level - it can mean nothing but good things.

3. 2011 CONCACAF Gold Cup














If there's one thing the 2009 Confederations Cup taught us it's that experience matters and confidence counts. Without their spectacular run to the final of the 2009 Confederations Cup it is hard to see how the USMNT would have found the realistic confidence to go up against world powers like Spain and Brazil. So the first step to the 2013 Confederations Cup in Brazil starts with the 2011 CONCACAF Gold Cup next summer. It's simple if the US wins, it books its ticket to the tournament and with it some much needed tournament experience ahead of the 2014 World Cup.

2. Michael Bradley












If there was one high quality constant throughout the World Cup for the U.S. it was the 22 year old midfielder and son of the coach, Michael Bradley. He was ever-present in the midfield, winning balls, linking up with the forwards and even scoring the crucial tying goal against Slovenia in the U.S.'s second group game. Bradley's performance for the National Team has long been one of a consistent but relatively unsung backbone for an otherwise schizophrenic midfield and the U.S. soccer community has sensed greatness. Now the NY Times Goal Blog has given statistics to his performances, placing him high in rankings such as tackling and distance covered. And with as many as two more World Cups ahead of him, he may just be the future of US Soccer.

1. The 2018/2022 US World Cup Bids











When the curtain falls on South Africa in two weeks, the world's focus will turn to the 2014 World Cup in Brazil and the announcement of the hosts for the 2018 and 2022 World Cup. The United States has bids to host the 2018 or 2022 tournament. MLS Commissioner Don Garber, US Soccer president Sunil Gulati, Henry Kissinger and Michael Bloomberg are on a board who has offered forth nothing but American football stadiums as venues (though, admittedly, they had few alternative options). The announcement for the host nations will take place some time in December of 2010.

Monday, June 28, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule Round of 16: June 29

TUESDAY, JUNE 29

Paraguay
v Japan
10:00am EDT, ESPN

Spain
v Portugal
2:30pm EDT, ESPN

Will the Bump in TV Ratings for the World Cup Translate to Interst in MLS?

US fans look on as Landon Donovan scores a goal against Ghana (AP)

ABC/ESPN is reporting that viewership for the US vs. Ghana game on Saturday was up 10% compared to the US vs. England game two weeks ago.

While this may be all well and good for the quadrennial soccer bandwagon and flag waving fans, what does it mean in terms of the long-term viability of the sport? It's one thing to draw in the casual fans who will cheer for anything if it has the American flag on it and another thing entirely to turn them into fans of the sport. A large number of Americans will watch the Olympics once every four years, but it's not like they're chomping at the bit for skating or gymnastics during the other three, you know what I mean?

But the outlook is looking good. Some reports have this season's overall MLS attendance to date up 10% compared to this time last year. More people are going to see their local team in person. And even though this year's numbers to date include the numbers for Philadelphia's two home games at PPL park with an average attendance of more than 29,000, they remain promising. More people are joining in the culture of American soccer. The sport isn't growing everywhere (that same report has attendance for New England and San Jose down by double digits), but it's growing. And I count that as a win.

Sunday, June 27, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule Round of 16: June 28

MONDAY, JUNE 28

Netherlands
v Slovakia
10:00am EDT, ESPN

Brazil
v Chile
2:30pm EDT, ESPN

Saturday, June 26, 2010

Look on the Bright Side: The US Loss Against Ghana Wasn't Entirely the Players' Fault

U.S. Coach Bob Bradley (source: TheFinalThird.com)

The pitch is not even cold yet and fans everywhere are throwing around reasons why the U.S. experienced a second-straight World Cup ending loss at the hands of Ghana. I may not be the only person to say it, and I'm sure I'm far from the first, but the loss was primarily fueled by poor coaching and team selection on behalf of head coach Bob Bradley.

THE BAD NEWS
Playing a lathargic 4-4-2 formation that included an out of form Jozy Altidore, an inexperienced and clinically deficient Robbie Findley, and a Ricardo Clark incapable of keeping possession and tracking runs in his own half, Bob Bradley failed to contain the fast-paced passing of the Ghanaians. As a result, the U.S. found themselves down a goal in the first five mintues of the game.

After Bradley substituted Maurice Edu for Clark in the 31st minute, Benny Feilhaber for Findley in the 45th minute, and Hurculez Gomez for Altidore in the 91st minute, Bradley had wasted his substitutions on correcting his initial tactical miscalculation. At that point the U.S. was left with no other option than to pin their hopes on their default mode: Heroic Acts of Magic. Well, Santa Claus isn't real and even this edition of the U.S's men's soccer team runs out of magic eventually.

THE GOOD NEWS
The U.S. Men's Soccer Team is experiencing some growing pains, it's safe to say. The talent, the desire and the experience existed in the roster for this team to go far. Injuries and attacking questions aside, players such as Clint Dempsey, Landon Donovan and Tim Howard were set to lead the side at least into the quarter-finals and possibly beyond, a la the team's miraculous Confederations Cup run the year before. The fact that Bradley was unable to properly channel and direct the team's potential is a sign that the Americans' viability is growing on the global stage. We're not quite there yet, but give it two more World Cups and the U.S. team won't just be in the knockout round by the (well earned) skin of their teeth. They'll be regularly fighting for the top position in their group and a force to be reckoned with.

Now if we could only get a coach that had the ability to adapt before a game starts.

Oh well, back to Major League Soccer and my good ole Columbus Crew.

Friday, June 25, 2010

Stateside Soccer's World Cup Round of 16 Predictions, Featuring Ms. Footynut!


In light of the less than flawless results from my World Cup Group predictions (one measure of success has me at 56% for correctly predicting which teams will get out of the group), I have decided to bring in guest blogger Ms. FootyNut to make the predictions for the Round of 16.

Uruguay v South Korea

Ms. FootyNut: This was really tough because South Korea beat some big names. However, Uruguay took their group without conceding a single goal. They beat South Africa on their home turf! I just feel like they are stronger at defense than South Korea. Uruguay to win.

FootyNut:
It's plain and simple for me, this World Cup is shaping up to be a display for South American teams. While Korea has had a somewhat of a surprising tournament (Asian teams have fared better than the African teams), I believe their luck runs out in the Round of 16. Uruguay will advance to the Quarter Finals.


USA
v Ghana

MF:
Ok, this prediction is about 50% desire, 50% logic. But I think our boys have done an outstanding job attacking (if only their goals are allowed!!), and Tim Howard is an amazing keeper! It's not going to be an easy win. Ghana was top of their group for a while, but they looked sluggish to me, like they lack self-esteem and they're ready to go home. USA to advance!

FN:
Throw me up on a gibbet and burn me in effigy, but I'm calling this one for Ghana. Although my faith in the massive home turf advantage the African teams would experience in South Africa failed me in my group match predictions, Ghana's U20 men's national team became the first African team to win a FIFA tournament on African soil when it defeated Brazil in last year's U20 World Cup. Expect a hard fought, but ultimately heartbreaking game for the Yanks.


Netherlands
v Slovakia

MF:
The Orange tide of the Netherlands just won their group so easily! Slovakia only barely beat Italy. I don't know if the Slovak's defense/goalkeeping combo is strong enough to stem the Dutch attack.

FN:
I agree with the Missus on this one. Slovakia's success in their group was - honestly - due less to their skill and more to the train wreck of an Italian team slowly but surely self destructing. The Netherlands will put on their requisite display of flash and substance on their way to the quarter-finals.


Brazil
v Chile

MF:
Well, I mean...what can you say? Brazil wins this one.Chile just isn't strong enough for this powerhouse. Brazil just seems unstoppable (and their fans insufferable ... but I digress).

FN:
Well, poor Chile. They've had an unlucky draw this cup. In any 2 out of 3 other groups Chile might have been drawn in, they would have won and been in a much more favorable position in the knock-outs. But as it sits, their dynamic performances weren't enough to hold stop Spain from topping the group and now have to face Brazil, a team they lost to twice in qualifying, with an aggregate score of 7-2. Brazil goes through.


Argentina
v Mexico

MF:
Mexico got through by the skin of their teeth. The beat France - which was easy given they are falling apart, and tied with South Africa who just weren't that strong this time around. Again, Argentina = obvious choice.

FN:
So if Messi is going to shine, now would be the time. However, it may be that - like his evil and much taller twin Cristiano Ronaldo - Messi's best role will be as an orchestrator for a stronger defense. And unlike Ronaldo, Messi has a wide selection of fellow, world class attackers to feed. Argentina wins.


Germany
v England

MF:
Again, more than 50% of this prediction is biased desire. This is not going to be an easy match. Germany have been excellent. England have not. I want to believe that the boys of the Three Lions will pull it together, start thinking and playing as a team, and start feeding Rooney some good passes! He knows how to find the back of the net, help him do it!! Rule, Britannia, England rule the game!

FN:
A star crossed lot this English team be. I'd love to see the Three Lions go through, but the Germans are a more cohesive unit who look threatening and ruthless in the final third. Germany will edge out England in this latest installment of World Soccer's greatest rivalries.


Paraguay
v Japan

MF:
I feel like Japan never expected to get through to the knockout rounds. They did well in their group but they're up against Paraguay who I abstractly view as another South American Powerhouse. Japan does have a chance though and could surprise me. I would welcome it actually, but I see Paraguay going through.

FN:
For an unengaged fan, this may be the most obscure match in the Round of 16. Japan has done nothing but exceed expectations and I think they will continue for just one more match. The Blue Samurai of Japan will make the quarter finals.


Spain
v Portugal

MF:
One word: Spain. I just don't like Ronaldo. Is that a good enough reason? But seriously, this was tough. I actually have no strong feelings about this decision. Spain were on top of their group (and European Champions in 2008), so why not, right?

FN:
Yeah, I'm still not convinced Spain will win it all, but I can say that Portugal and Ronaldo just won't be able to make enough of an impact against the savvy possession of Xavi, Iniesta, Alonso and Villa. The Spaniards might not win the tournament, but they'll win this one. Spain to win.


If you want to see how both Ms. FootyNut and I predict the rest of the World Cup to go - including all winners and losers down to the champions and third place teams - check out our dueling brackets.

Dueling World Cup Brackets: Who Will Win It All?

So guest blogger and supposed fiancee of yours truly, Ms FootyNut, decided to draft a bracket to compete against mine for the knock-out rounds of the tournament. I have the Netherlands winning a final over Germany with Spain edging Ghana out for third place. She has an epic finish with Brazil triumphing over Argentina and Spain taking third place at the cost of Uruguay.

To be fair, Ms FootyNut's was probably a bit more methodical. In truth, I took my lead from the Wall Street Journal's old dartboard contest. Random, unpredictable selections may end up making me look like a psychic.

Stateside Soccer's Bracket:


Ms. FootyNut's Bracket:



Stateside Soccer is Now on Facebook

Stateside Soccer launched its Facebook fan page Friday. The page is open to any fans of soccer from the United States and abroad.

Blog readers and followers of @StatesideSoccer on Twitter can enjoy the same level of news and commentary on soccer leagues, teams and trends from around the globe, including:
  • The one stop shop for breaking news from FIFA, the US Men's National Soccer Team, Major League Soccer, USSF-D2, and the USL Premier Development League.
  • Easy to read guides to the fundamentals of soccer for new-comers to the Beautiful Game.
  • Exclusive commentary on soccer trends in the United States.
  • Predictions and brackets for major tournaments and matches.
  • Analysis of soccer in the US media by a communications professional with experience in journalism and public relations.
  • The occasional off-beat post by Ms. FootyNut, a new-comer to the sport and an expert in layperson soccer commentary.
In the next few months following the unfortunate, but unavoidable end of the 2010 FIFA World Cup, Stateside Soccer will examine the gains soccer has made in the US, the return of MLS soccer and the ramp up to the 2011 CONCACAF Gold Cup and the announcements of the host countries for the 2018 and 2022 World Cups.

For more information on Stateside Soccer, the information it covers and any media inquiries, email StatesideSoccer (at) gmail (dot) com.

Stateside Soccer is a soccer blog based in Detroit, Michigan covering US soccer and soccer from around the globe, including Major League Soccer (MLS), the US Men's National Team (USMNT), English Premier League (EPL), UEFA Champions League, Australian A-League and the general popularity of soccer in the United States. Follow Stateside Soccer on Twitter @StatesideSoccer and on Facebook.

World Cup US TV Schedule: June 26 & 27 - The Biggest Weekend in the History of American Soccer?

Image: Seattle Sportsnet

There has been a lot of talk about the stakes for this World Cup being the highest ever when it comes to soccer in the United States. If I'm being completely honest, it's been a little too much hype. But when it comes to tomorrow's knock-out game, the notion that Saturday is the biggest day in the history of US Soccer might just have some legs. Even US coach Bob Bradley - a man with a poker face that would make Lady Gaga blush - has expressed gleeful optimism ahead of the match, stating this year's team "could go far" in the tournament.

If the US wins tomorrow, they will most likely be in a strong position to meet Brazil in a semi-final rematch last year's Confederations Cup final. But while it's okay to dream, it's not okay for a team with a shaky first 15 minutes and an overly strong penchant for heroics and fighting back in a game rather than holding on and securing a win, let's be realistic and take one game at a time.



SATURDAY, JUNE 26


Uruguay v South Korea
10:00am EDT, ESPN

United States
v Ghana
2:30pm EDT, ABC


SUNDAY, JUNE 27

Germany v England
10:00am EDT, ESPN

Argentina v Mexico
2:30pm EDT, ABC


Thursday, June 24, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule: June 25

FRIDAY, JUNE 25

North Korea vs. Ivory Coast
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN 2

Portugal vs. Brazil
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Switzerland vs. Honduras
2:30 p.m. EDT, ESPN 2

Chile vs. Spain
2:30 p.m. EDT, ESPN

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule: June 24

THURSDAY, JUNE 24

Slovakia vs. Italy
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Paraguay vs. New Zealand
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN 2

Denmark vs. Japan
2:30 p.m. EDT, ESPN

Cameroon vs. Netherlands
2:30 p.m. EDT, ESPN 2

Truly Epic Wins

Download Stateside Soccer's World Cup Knock-Out Round Bracket HERE. Fill it out in pencil or in pen, share it with your friends, enjoy the great soccer that is yet to come.


What a finish for Group C!!! You could not ask for more drama, suspense, or beauty in the USA's story. Robbed of two goals, both disallowed in objectionable circumstances during pivotal matches, only to come back in the 91st minute of the final game to win the group. Beautiful. There are hardly words. And I can't forget to mention England's showing, which was just as well done, holding off Slovenia's attacks for a clean 1-0 final. Magnificent.

Now that we are closer to the Final 16 I'd like to share with you the reusable, printable bracket I made. It's hosted on Google Docs for all the world to see and print here.

As a reminder, here are the standings so far:

Group A:
1. Uruguay
2. Mexico

Group B:
1. Argentina
2. South Korea

Group C:
1. USA
2. England

Group D:
1. Germany
2. Ghana

Also guaranteed a spot:
Group E, Netherlands and Group G, Brazil

Group D plays their final games today at 2:30pm EST. Can Ghana beat Germany and hold onto the top spot? Will Australia come from behind to get the win required to go through?! [Edit to Add] Yeah, that didn't happen...Germany and Ghana are through.

It's all terribly exciting!!

In case you missed it, Ms FootyNut is guest blogging here to give a layperson's view of footy and the World Cup.

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule: June 23

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 23

Slovenia vs. England
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN 2

USA vs. Algeria
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Ghana vs. Germany
2:30 p.m. EDT, ESPN

Australia vs. Serbia
2:30 p.m. EDT, ESPN 2

Monday, June 21, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule: June 22

TUESDAY, JUNE 22

Mexico vs. Uruguay
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

France vs. South Africa
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN 2

Nigeria vs. South Korea
2:30 p.m. EDT, ESPN 2

Greece vs. Argentina
2:30 p.m. EDT, ESPN

Promotion/Relegation League System Part of US Soccer's '50 Year Plan'

Sunil Gulati (left), President of the US Soccer Federation (USSoccerPlayers.com)

A Stefan Fatsis article published Saturday on Slate Magazine's website has wrenched my attention from the World Cup for a minute. In the article, US Soccer Federation president Sunil Gulati implies that a promotion/relegation league system with a fall-winter-spring season will be given a strong consideration by the USSF in the next 25 years.

According to Gulati, such changes are part of a 50 year plan aimed at cementing the United States' status at soccer's "adult table." Never mind that the plan was unheard of before last year. Never mind that there has been no serious talk of how to go about implementing such a plan in light of the MLS's fierce protection of its centralized franchise system and the inability of second tier professional leagues to maintain a viable business model. And never mind that it was more of a rhetorical reaction to FIFA president Sepp Blatter's joke that after a conceding 3 goals in the second half of the 3-2 loss to Brazil in the final of the 2009 Confederations Cup, the US would do well to remember that soccer is a game of two halves.

My main concern when it comes to a promotion/relegation league system in the United States is the question of financial and organizational viability. While a most of America's "big" sports have multi-tiered leagues, non of them are interconnected and most of them are set-up as player "farms" to feed top-tier teams. In fact, a number of second and third and even more fourth tier soccer teams in the United States have developmental ties to Major League Soccer franchises. If these teams were to become independent, self-determined entities, it may become more expensive for teams to recruit and develop players, which in turn may increase player development costs across all tiers.

So while Gulati's statements may be less of a concrete plan and more abstract conjecture, they have basis in a comforting truth: Soccer's progress in the United States over the past 25 years has been meteoric and the next 25 years may be even bigger.

Sunday, June 20, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule: June 21

MONDAY, JUNE 21

Portugal vs. North Korea
7:30 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Chile vs. Switzerland
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Spain vs. Honduras
2:30 p.m. EDT, ESPN

World Cup Week One Round Up

Three England fans looking only slightly less ridiculous than their team (Telegraph.co.uk)

As we're coming to the end of the second weekend of the 2010 FIFA World Cup, we find ourselves faced with a compelling final five days of group stage games. And even with 29 of 48 group matches played, only the Netherlands and Brazil have guaranteed themselves a spot in the next round. Needless to say, my predictions have almost all been thrown out the window.

Draws Dominate Crucial Group C Games
Through almost freakishly unpredictable circumstances, three draws in the opening four games of Group C have left Slovenia on top of the group table with four points. The United States sits in second place with two points, edging England to third on account of goals scored.

After leaving their first match against England with a well-deserved 1-1 draw, the United States showed the spectacularly gritty nature of its team character when they fought back from a two goal deficit at half time to draw and nearly beat a slick Slovenian side in their second match.

England, on the other hand, apparently forgot to eat their Wheaties and struggled to produce any sort of attacking threat in a 0-0 draw in their second group stage match against Algeria.


World Powers Stumble, Self-Destruct
Spain, the reigning European champions and a prominent favorite to win this year's world cup found themselves on the wrong side of a 1-0 scoreline against a lucky and well organized (imagined that) Swiss side.

After pummeling a lackluster, befuddled Australian side 4-0 in their opening games, tournament regulars Germany lost 1-0 to a stalwart Serbian side.

Defending World Cup winners Italy not only came from behind to salvage a draw in their opener against Paraguay, but they found themselves in need of a similar performance to salvage not only a point but their dignity from their second game against a spectacularly organized New Zealand side. The Azzuri now sit on 2 points going into the final day.

If it wasn't enough that France all but cheated its way into a spot in South Africa, they opened their tournament with an uninspired 0-0 draw against Uruguay. Then the French proceeded to fall apart in a 2-0 loss to Mexico. The self-destruction continued into the weekend when forward Nicolas Anelka was sent home, the French players refused to train and many of the coaching staff simply quit.

And as ESPN the Magazine's World Cup preview so astutely put it, "There will always be an England and it will always disappoint." And with a goalless draw against Algeria of all teams, the Three Lions of England have surely disappointed.


Quality of Refereeing Goes from Amazing to Appalling
The refereeing of the opening dozen games or so was nearly impeccable. The most prominent example of the outstanding refereeing came in the opening match of the tournament when Mexico's Carlos Vela was correctly called off side against the protests of about 85% of the matches viewers, including the ESPN commentating crew.

However, come Friday, the wheels starting coming off the refereeing cart. Germany's loss came within the context of Spanish referee Alberto Mallenco's 10 cards, including the sending off of the German's World Cup Talisman, Miroslav Klose. Then, with only 10 minutes to go in the US's match against Slovenia, Malian referee Koman Coulibaly disallowed a US goal by calling a foul that remains unfathomable in the face of dozens of slow motion replays.


Regardless of what the past 10 days have brought us, they are sure to bring exciting match-ups and edge-of-your-seat moments. Will New Zealand pull off the unthinkable and follow Paraguay out of the group, leaving the Italians behind to ponder what might have been? Will the US and Slovenia leave England equally befuddled by elimination? Will the cards fall just right for Australia? Will it be Portugal or the Ivory Coast who advances from the group of death? Will an African team be able to make it to the knock out stages in the first tournament held on African soil?

We'll just have to watch some more to find out.

Friday, June 18, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule: June 19 & 20

SATURDAY, JUNE 19

Netherlands vs. Japan
7:30 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Ghana vs. Australia
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Cameroon vs. Denmark
2:30 p.m. EDT, ABC


SUNDAY, JUNE 20

Slovakia vs. Paraguay
7:30 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Italy vs. New Zealand
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Brazil vs. Ivory Coast
2:30 p.m. EDT, ABC

Who Are Ya! Who Are Ya! ...Cheering For?

Missed Ms FootyNut's first post? Find it here.
Photo: Simon Bruty/Sports Illustrated

I have officially been bitten by the World Cup bug and I'm infecting several people I work with. Huzzah!

Like World Cup die-hard fans I've been trying to keep up with all the games. I can't watch them at work, but I do scan the news feeds for updates and once I know what their uniforms look like, I'm pretty good at playing the game in my head - Pass, pass, pass, pass, tackle, ball out of play, throw in, pass, pass...you get it. You may ask, "How is that satisfying?" Usually I just keep hoping anyone and everyone will score. I think that stems from growing up in Hockey Town where games are relatively "high scoring".

But now that I know a little bit more about this game, and the teams, I keep myself interested by always picking a side. I am one of those people that if I don't have an allegience, I always root for the underdog. For me this is also true in politics - I voted for Nader in '08.

This most recent round for Group B, I was rooting for South Korea because Park Ji-Sung is on that team, but also plays for Manchester United - Mr. FootyNut's Premireship team. And in Group A I was rooting for Mexico because, well, no one should be rooting for those dirty cheating French.

During the Greece/Nigeria game there was a short discussion on The Guardian's Minute By Minute about how South African fans are rooting for any African team because to them, a win for that team equals win for the continent (according to the comments on the Guardian). This is not a phenom that we've seen elsewhere, particularly Europe. A win for Germany wouldn't necessarily be highly celebrated in Spain or even England. Would we be happy if Mexico won? What about Canada (if they'd made it)? I haven't noticed this African bias with the Algerian game, anyone else?

While Mr. FootyNut and I are on a media black-out today (so we can watch the Group C games uninterrupted later tonight) debate these questions with us.

What do you think about the African bias? Are there other allegiances out there I don't know about? Who do you vote for when "your team" isn't playing? OR, is that tempting fate and you secretly wish there was a lose-lose option for everyone else?

Thursday, June 17, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule: June 18

FRIDAY, JUNE 18

German vs. Serbia
7:30 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Slovenia vs. USA
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

England vs. Algeria
2:30 p.m. EDT, ESPN 2

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule: June 17

THURSDAY, JUNE 17

Argentina vs. South Korea
7:30 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Greece vs. Nigeria
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

France vs. Mexico
2:30 p.m. EDT, ESPN 2

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule: June 16

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 16

Honduras vs. Chile
7:30 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Spain vs. Switzerland
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

South Africa vs. Uruguay
2:30 p.m. EDIT, ESPN

Monday, June 14, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule: June 15

TUESDAY, JUNE 15:

New Zealand vs. Slovakia
7:30 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Ivory Coast vs. Portugal
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Brazil vs. North Korea
2:30 p.m. EDT, ESPN

Sunday, June 13, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule: June 14

MONDAY, JUNE 14:

Netherlands vs. Denmark
7:30 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Japan vs. Cameroon
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Italy vs. Paraguay
2:30 p.m. EDT, ESPN

US v. England Reaction: Draw Bears More Fizzle Than Pop

Source: Getty Images

The United States and England fought to what may best be described as a draw only a mother could love today in their first group match of the 2010 World Cup. After 90 minutes of play contained primarily in the midfield, the two sides emerged with a 1-1 draw, granting each team one point towards qualification for the knock-out rounds of the tournament.

While US soccer fans everywhere were (for the most part) enthused with the result - my local pub in suburban Detroit was filled with fans cheering on Team USA - some of the more casual observers of the game were left slightly bewildered. If this match was in fact the biggest in the history of U.S. soccer, why would it end in a tie? Hell, how could it end in a tie? What does a tie even mean?

What do you think? Was the result one step forward for the U.S. team but two steps backward for the sport's popularity in America? Or is the maelstrom of negativity surrounding the match only a result of the increased exposure of the tournament? Is it accurate to assume that the bigger soccer gets in the United States, the louder its haters will yell?

I'll just say that thank God it wasn't a scoreless draw (I'm looking at you, France and Uruguay).

Friday, June 11, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule: June 12 & June 13

SATURDAY, JUNE 12

South Korea vs. Greece
7:30 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Argentina vs. Nigeria
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

England vs. USA
10 a.m. EDT, ABC


SUNDAY, JUNE 13

Algeria vs. Slovenia
7:30 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Serbia vs. Ghana
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Germany vs. Australia
2:30 p.m. EDT, ABC

Contributing Blogger - Meet MsFootyNut


Hello Blogosphere, I’m so pleased that Mr. FootyNut has invited me to blog with him. He thinks my perspective as an "outsider" may be amusing. I think he's barking, but if you bear with me, you can be the judge.


To give you some background, I was never a huge fan of soccer. I played in elementary school, sure. I spent many semesters and summers in the UK as a young adult and thought I would very much like to understand soccer, but I never made the effort. Then when Mr. FootyNut revealed he was a fanboy, I knew it was all about to change. I can’t really call myself a huge fan now, but I watch the important games and I cheer when a team scores, and yell when they get fouled or robbed of what was obviously going to be the most spectacular shot evar!! And I try really hard to understand the idiosyncrasies of the off-side rule.


As Mr. FootyNut previously wrote, his head exploded on June 5th when the USA met Australia. While I too have a mushy place in my heart for that continent "down under", my head stayed intact. It was just a friendly after all. However, this will all change tomorrow when the US meets England.


I guestimate that more than half of my heart lies with England. In 2006, ROOTS had a sale of all the World Cup stuff (after it was all over) and I bought an England t-shirt. I don't even remember if they had a USA one made! And this year, when purchasing some fan gear in preparation for this little tourney, I chose an England scarf over the US scarf – if only 40% because it was easier to find!


Don’t get me wrong, I really want the US to do well in this race. I really want to show our country that soccer does matter!! But on the other hand, England deserves to win again. It's been a long time, and they're more likely to go all the way to the finals than anyone else in C group – did I also mention I'm of Arab heritage and am secretly routing for Algeria too? I'm a complicated woman. Slovenia, you’re on your own.


Anyway, this ain’t no friendly game of footie here!! This counts towards that shiny gold thing Morgan Freeman is so fond of! So on Saturday afternoon I may be the only one in our pub supporting the "limeys" over the "yanks" and I'll just have to be ok with that.

Cheers.

The USMNT's Top 5 World Cup Matches



There is a lot of hype surrounding the importance of the US's first match of the 2010 World Cup against the Three Lions of England (2:30pm EDT, ABC). Many are saying that it is the biggest World Cup game the Yanks have ever played. But no matter the outcome, there are at least 5 other games who can give tomorrow's match a run for their money:

5. US v. Paraguay (Uruguay 1930)


So yes, the first World Cup consisted of only 13 teams. But the U.S. made a strong first impression on first asking. Plowing their way to the semi-finals with a dominating 3-0 win over Paraguay. In 2006, FIFA recognized that Bert Patenaude scored all three goals in this match, thus becoming the first person to score a hat trick in a World Cup.

4. US v. Portugal (Japan / South Korea 2002)


Really, you can make every match of the 2002 World Cup number one on this list (except the match against Poland). However, that's not fun. In lieu of this cop out, the second group match of the 2002 makes the list at number 4. This match ended in an electric 3-2 scoreline in favor of the yanks and catapulted them into the second round with room for a reality check by the Poles along the way that may just have served to ground the team going into the knock out rounds.

3. US v. Colombia (USA 1994)


The United States entered the 1994 World Cup with the disdain of the World on its shoulders. It had received the right to host the tournament despite of its poor world ranking and lack of a top tier professional outdoor league. However, after a 1-1 draw against Scotland, the global community cocked an eyebrow. So when the US met and beat then fourth ranked Colombia 2-1 on home soil in Detroit, soccer fever hit the nation and has never really let go ... sorta.

2. US v. Germany (Japan / South Korea 2002)


Only one word describes this quarterfinal match up from the USMNT's epic run in 2002: Bittersweet. The Yanks not only stayed with the Germans, but they out played the European powerhouse. So after a heartbreaking goal by Michael Ballack, a masterclass performance by German goalkeeper Oliver Kahn and a handball save on the German goal line, the Yanks were left on the wrong side of a 1-0 scoreline. The consolation? Even the German players admitted the US outplayed them.

1. US v. England (Brazil 1950)


While the US v Germany game of the World Cup beats the US upset of England of 1950 in prominence and impact, the Miracle on Grass in nothing short of soccer legend. Appearing in just its second world cup in 20 years, nothing was expected of the fledgling American team when it came up against the inventors and popular legends of the game, England. So when the Yanks beat the English 1-0, it was a soccer shot heard round the world.


But what if the US repeats its upset? What if it propels the team into another legendary run deep into the tournament. What if that run sparks a widespread soccer fever that makes 1994 look pale in comparison? Will the US v. England match of 2010 rocket to the top of this list? More than likely. But it will have to be an epic win if it is to go down as a great match when we look back at it 20 years from now?

What do you think? What will the impact of tomorrow's match be on soccer 20 years from now?

Thursday, June 10, 2010

World Cup US TV Schedule: June 11

FRIDAY, JUNE 11:

South Africa
vs. Mexico
10 a.m. EDT, ESPN

Uruguay vs. France
2:30 p.m. EDT, ESPN

Soccer 101: What is the World Cup and Why Should I Care?

We are so tantalizingly close to the World Cup, the excitement is palpable. Tonight, millions of soccer fans will go to bed and slip into fantastic dreams about their country's team making a heroic run in the cup. Tomorrow, the wait will be over as the first ball is kicked and the first matches played for the 2010 World Cup in South Africa. But how did the World Cup become such a huge deal?


THE FIFA WORLD CUP


The World Cup as Americans know it is actually the final stage of a two and a half year long competition involving 205 countries and more than 900 matches. The World Cup Final is contested by the remaining 32 teams who have qualified to compete for the trophy every four years.

Brief History
The brainchild of then FIFA president Jules Rimet, the first World Cup Final was held in 1930 with Uruguay as the host. While all FIFA member countries were invited to take part in the tournament, due to the travel expenses, very few teams outside the Americas made the trip. Uruguay went on to win the tournament in front of a crowd of 93,000 people. An international phenomenon was born.

The World Cup has been contested in some form every four years for the past eight decades (with the exception of 1942 and 1946, due to a tiny global snafu known as World War II). Only seven countries have won the tournament, and only five of those countries have done it more than once. For the record: Brazil has won the World Cup 5 times (1958, 1962, 1970, 1994, 2002), Italy 4 times (1934, 1938, 1982, 2006), Germany 3 times (1954, 1974, 1990), Argentina and Uruguay have both won 2 times (1978, 1986 and 1930, 1950, respectively), and both France and England have won the tournament 1 time (1998 and 1966, respectively, and both while hosting).

While the exact details of qualification change every four years, the current system of all eligible teams competing for 32 spots in a group round robin followed by a single elimination tournament was only introduced in 1998.

Qualification
The international soccer community is divided into six geographic confederations, each of which is giving a certain number of slots at the finals:
  • Africa (6 places, including 2010 host)
  • Asia (4 or 5 places)*
  • Europe (13 places)
  • North America, Central America and the Caribbean (3 or 4 places)*
  • Oceania (0 or 1 places)*
  • South America (4 or 5 places)*
The teams in each region compete in a multi-round, seeded round-robin competition for spots at the World Cup finals. Each region is designated a certain number of spots in the world cup according to the strength of its countries.

* For many of the regions, the total number of spots allotted depends on inter-continental playoffs between countries in the final rounds of qualification, hence why the weaker countries of the Oceania confederation - teams such as Fiji, the Solomon Island and New Zealand - are not guaranteed a spot in the finals. To qualify for the 2010 tournament, New Zealand (the winner of Oceania qualification) had to defeat the fifth place team from Asia's qualification. Likewise, as the fifth place finisher in South America, Uruguay had to beat North America's fourth place finisher for a spot in the finals. For complete details on the qualification process, see here.

The first rounds of qualification for the 2010 FIFA World Cup Final in South Africa began in the October 2007 and finished two years later in November 2009.

The Finals
Once the final 32 teams have qualified, they are divided into 8 groups of 4 teams each. In the opening stages of the tournament (known as the group stage), the teams play three matches, one against each of the other teams in the group. The teams receive 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw and 0 points for a loss. The two teams with the most points advance to the knock out rounds of the tournament.

The final four stages of the tournament are single elimination knock-out until a champion is crowned. A game to determine third and fourth place is also played. The entire tournament takes a month.

Why should I care?
Quite simply because there is nothing like the World Cup. Nothing. And in 90 minutes, anything can happen. Anything. There are the favorites to win, to be sure, but every four years a few teams of which nothing is expected shock the world and strike down the great powers on their way to unthinkable glory (think the USA and South Korea in 2002). It's as compelling as sports gets and it's the most universal sport humanity has. There. Is. Nothing. Like. It.

Tomorrow on Soccer 101: The freaking World Cup. Go watch it already! ... But if you want to swing by here, we'll have Saturday's TV listings (tomorrow's World Cup TV listings will be posted later today).

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Soccer 101: The Rabid Fans

So we've dealt with the rules (even that really confusing offside one). We've dealt with the faking. We've dealt with the player's positions and team formations. We've even dealt with the referees and their roles in a game. There's only one large enigma left to explain to the soccer newcomer: The millions of people around the world who actually enjoy watching, following, living and breathing this game.


SOCCER FANS


Ok, you may think you've met something like a soccer fan. But you haven't. You've seen teamsters strip down to their underwear for Green Bay football. You've seen half naked white trash follow their favorite NASCAR drivers around the country in a trailer. You've seen a guy drop his toddler to catch a fly ball. But you still haven't seen anything like a soccer fan.

Soccer is not just a passion for these people. It's not even an obsession. It's a way of life. Period.

Not only have some soccer clubs been around for 150 years, they are often supported by generations of the same family, from the same neighborhood.

Consider this: America supports three major professional sports with about 30 teams each. In England alone, the entire soccer pyramid contains 7,000 teams, every one of which could theoretically rise and fall to either the very top or the very bottom of the league system. And each year over 700 professional, semi-professional and amateur teams compete each year for a single trophy, the F.A. Cup.

Soccer fans love their teams so much, they sing about it and the songs aren't even 25% vulgar ... most of the time. Although, it can be kind of disturbing watching thousands of German fans chant anything in unison.

So when the World Cup comes around every four years, the fans in these countries skip work en masse. Many countries (including Germany during 2006 and South Africa in 2010) grant official public holidays during the tournament. All activity in countries such as Brazil, for example, completely stops while their national team is playing.

American's love their sports, there's no doubt about it. But when it comes to soccer - a sport played by nearly everyone else everywhere else in the world - we're talking about the closest thing to a universal language humanity has ever known. That is a passion on a scale even Yankees fans, Dallas Cowboy fans, Los Angeles Lakers fans cannot match.

It's a beautiful game to play. It's a beautiful game to watch. And it's a damned beautiful game to be a part of.

Tomorrow on Soccer 101: What is the World Cup and Why Should I Care?

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Soccer 101: Why is that Guy Rolling on the Ground?

Without out a doubt, the most common criticism Jim Bobs everywhere have of soccer is the players just seem so wimpy. To the novice, soccer appears to have a slow speed and little physical contact. So when a player hits the deck, writhing in agony as if he'll need his leg amputated from a seemingly innocuous challenge, people used to watching men the size of household appliances crashing into each other in full body armor are less than impressed. Add to this the fact that many of these displays are in fact fake and the people in question are left with a less than endearing impression.


SOCCER'S (BAD) ACTING


The situation: A fast paced player (perhaps a winger?) is weaving in and out of defenders down the field. His feet are like lightening and his vision seems ingenious. Then, just as he's reaching the top of the penalty box, the ball gets away from him and he crumples against a solid challenge from a defender. After three flamboyant rolls, he is left clutching his knee or his ankle or his back or his face, wincing in agony as if he is about to pass a paperweight-sized kidney stone. Is he bleeding? Does he need medical attention? Is he going to die?! Clearly, a foul has been committed.

But the referee is unimpressed and dismisses the situation with a frown and a wave or even a wry smile and a wagging finger. The player may stay crumpled on the ground for a bit, but eventually he gets up and continues playing, back to fine health. And no one says another word about it.

So why did he go out of his way to fake an injury? The answer is simple, but the reasoning is a little harder to understand. The player is trying to draw a foul and give his team some sort of advantage.

Players draw fouls because they want to influence the referee's decisions and they know they can get away with it. Soccer can be an incredibly dangerous game with players experiencing compound fractures and concussions. On top of this, the real-time, fast-paced nature of soccer means that referees are often yards behind players (who can be as much as half their age) when calls need to be made. So when a player is fouled (or not), the referee may not always be in the best position to make the correct call, so he must make an educated guess.

The catch? Intentionally faking a foul (or simulating) is against the rules and punishable by a yellow card. But in a game where infractions can take place in the blink of the eye and yards away from any official, how are the referees to know which are real and which are faked? As a result, players are only called for simulation when it is particularly obvious, often in the box. However, more often than not, players get away with it. A problem? Yes. But the best referees can minimize its impact.

Tomorrow on Soccer 101: The Fans